Nelson v. Crocker National Bank

Good Law
124 Cal. Rptr. 229·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1394·51 Cal. App. 3d 536
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1975Civ. 14551California1,645 words

Opinion

Opinion

Evans, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment entered on motion of defendant Crocker National Bank. The motion was predicated and granted on the basis of res judicata. On appeal, plaintiff contends the bar of res judicata was not applicable in that the judgment and decision establishing that bar were void for lack of jurisdiction.

In 1962, plaintiff purchased from Theodore Lakin (deceased) unpatented mining claims in Sierra County. Plaintiff gave Lakin a $6,000 promissory note dated June 4, 1962, and secured by a deed of trust on property in San Joaquin County. Plaintiff subsequently learned that title to the claims was in question and that Lakin may have failed ,to comply with the requirements of section 2314 of the Public Resources Code requiring one hundred dollars’ worth of improvement work be done to mining claims in order to retain possession. Two Sierra County residents claimed ownership of the claims adversely to plaintiff. Plaintiff initiated an ejectment suit against them, but for an unexplained reason, later abandoned the action.

Plaintiff made no payments on his note to Lakin, and in 1963, Lakin pressed him for interest payments. Plaintiff advised Lakin by letter, “ .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.