Terrones

Gordon Termite Control v. Terrones

Good Law
148 Cal. Rptr. 310·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1850·84 Cal. App. 3d 176
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 1978Civ. 52338California651 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kingsley, J.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in an action on an alleged contract not to compete. We reverse the judgment.

Defendant was employed by plaintiff as a “sales, service and managing” employee over a period of 10 years prior to March of 1972. His employment was terminated for one day when he was rehired under a written agreement reading as follows:

He continued to work under that agreement until October 7, 1974. On October 9, 1974, plaintiff sold its pest control accounts to Stanley Pest Control Company for a consideration of $13,200, payable in three installments of $4,433.40. Allegedly because of defendant’s activities as an employee of a third pest control business, 211 of the Gordon accounts were cancelled. Gordon and Stanley settled Stanley’s claim for the cancellation of those accounts by cancelling (with Gordon’s consent) the final installment of the purchase price. Gordon then sued defendant for the amount thus lost to it and recovered judgment in that amount plus costs. We reverse that judgment.

I

Because we conclude that the agreement relied on by Gordon was illegal and void, we need not, and do not, discuss various collateral matters argued in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.