Appleman

Appleman v. National-Ben Franklin Insurance of Illinois

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 117·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1941·84 Cal. App. 3d 1012
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1978Civ. 16471California766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

John Alan Appleman appeals the summary judgment entered on the motion of National-Ben Franklin Insurance Company of Illinois (Company) which foreclosed his suit for hospitalization benefits.

Appleman underwent cancer surgery and incurred hospital expenses of $3,038.65. On receiving the bill for hospitalization, Company refused to pay saying those expenses were “not actually incurred” or Appleman was “not required to pay” because these charges were paid by Medicare.

The question here concerns how Medicare Part A payments are to be treated. The pertinent parts of the insurance contract with Company read:

Appleman says he relied on the brochure in buying Company’s insurance and the brochure said:

He points out that if these hospital costs had been paid by Blue Cross or a like insurer, Company would have paid the bill again. Appleman argues that payments from Medicare are no different.

Only a few cases have addressed the question of Medicare Plan A benefits. Appleman cites us to two: Black v. American Bankers Insurance Company (Texas) 478 S.W.2d 434 ; and Niles v. American Bankers Insurance Company (La.App.) 229 So.2d 435 . Both of these cases deal only with whether a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.