Tarr

Tarr v. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc.

Caution
148 Cal. Rptr. 813·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1911·84 Cal. App. 3d 707
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1978Civ. 52048California3,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jefferson, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Ernest J. Tarr from a judgment of dismissal of his third amended complaint following the trial court’s sustaining of a demurrer. The defendants who interposed the demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint were Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. (hereinafter Merco) and Safeco Insurance Company (hereinafter Safeco).

Plaintiff’s third amended complaint set forth three causes of action. The first cause of action was against Merco alone. In the first cause of action plaintiff alleged that, on March 19, 1973, plaintiff and Merco entered into a written contract wherein Merco agreed to construct for plaintiff on premises described as 5734 Ravenspur Drive, Palos Verdes Peninsula, a 21-unit condominium building and garage for a maximum price of $610,605 to be paid by plaintiff. It was alleged that the contract provided for Merco to complete the building within nine months after commencement. It was alleged that defendant did not complete construction of the building by December 21, 1973, which was the end of the nine-month period. Plaintiff alleged that Merco failed to complete the building in accordance with plans and specifications, which was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.