Mines

Equico Lessors, Inc. v. Mines

Good Law
148 Cal. Rptr. 554·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1875·84 Cal. App. 3d 374·25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1435
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1978Civ. 41707California920 words

Opinion

Opinion

Halvonik, J.

Appellants Robert Mines and William Jenkins are medical doctors who signed leases for oil well drilling equipment with International Medical Leasing, Inc. (IML). Appellants entered the agreement for the purpose of obtaining a tax shelter. They paid rent on the leases until their tax deductions were disallowed, then they stopped. Respondent Equico Lessors, Inc., assignees of IML, brought this action to recover unpaid rent. Appellants’ principal defense was that there had been a failure of consideration because the equipment had not been delivered. The trial court held that Commercial Code section 9206 made such a defense untenable.

The leases appellants executed stated: “The rights of any assignee shall be free from all defenses, setoffs, or counterclaims of any kind or character which Lessee may be entitled to assert against Lessor . . . .”

Section 9206 of the Commercial Code provides that an agreement by a lessee that he will not assert against any assignee any claim or defense that he might have against a lessor is enforceable by an assignee who takes his assignment for value, in good faith and without notice of a claim or defense, except as to the kind of defenses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.