Goodman

Goodman v. Superior Court

Good Law
148 Cal. Rptr. 799·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 1904·84 Cal. App. 3d 621
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 1978Civ. 44354California1,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

This case presents the question of whether the intentional disfigurement of a person’s face permits prosecution for the statutory crime of mayhem. It arises under the following circumstances, extracted from the preliminary transcript and presumed to be true for the purpose of resolving the legal issue before us.

Petitioner Numa Goodman had lived with the victim, Ms. Belcher, for about five years. On December 26, 1977, after a separation of several weeks, petitioner visited Ms. Belcher at her apartment. An argument ensued; petitioner, drawing a kitchen knife from under his jacket, stabbed Ms. Belcher twice in the left chest area, twice on the arm, and once on the face.

It is the latter wound with which we are concerned, since it forms the basis for the mayhem charge.

Petitioner was held to answer on a charge of violating Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a), assault with a deadly weapon, and entered a plea of guilty to that count. When the People moved the mayhem charge to trial, petitioner sought, and we issued, an alternative writ of mandamus to consider the question whether, as a matter of law, a five-inch wound inflicted on the victim’s face, resulting in no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.