MacHado

MacHado v. Superior Court

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 344·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1687·45 Cal. App. 3d 316
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1975Civ. 2437California1,524 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Petition for writ of mandate to review respondent’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence prior to trial. Writ granted.

The fundamental question is whether, absent exigent circumstances, the failure of police officers to comply with the notice requirements of Penal Code section 1531 in securing a house until a search warrant is obtained, renders illegal the subsequent seizure of contraband in the house pursuant to the warrant. We hold that it does.

Statement of the Case

An information was filed in the respondent court charging petitioner with a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11359, possession of marijuana for sale. A Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress evidence was denied by respondent. A timely petition for review of respondent’s ruling was filed with this court and we issued an order to show cause.

Statement of Facts

On May 22, 1974, just before 2 p.m., Detective Matt of the Stanislaus County sheriff’s office was in the vicinity of petitioner’s residence at'614 Coldwell. The residence was under surveillance because it was suspected that a delivery of contraband might be made there. In particular, Detective Matt was looking for Richard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.