Iverson

Iverson v. Spang Industries, Inc.

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 399·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1686·45 Cal. App. 3d 303
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1975Civ. 34782California3,711 words

Opinion

Opinion

Emerson, J.

From judgment in their favor, or partially so, plaintiff Iverson and defendant-cross-complainant Spang Industries, Inc. (Spang) take this appeal. Each claims inadequacy of its respective award and each makes other contentions which we shall discuss as we reach them. Spang has denominated its appeal a cross-appeal and for the sake of clarity we shall adopt that terminology.

Iverson sued Spang for damages for breach of a lease covenant which required Spang, the lessee, upon surrender of the premises to restore the building to its original condition, normal wear and tear excepted. Spang cross-complained against its sub-lessees Conn and Zebb asking for indemnification from them in the event that it (Spang) should be held liable.

The trial court determined that Iverson should be awarded damages in the amount of $2,711.45 plus attorney’s fees and costs of suit, and that Spang was entitled to be indemnified by cross-defendant Zebb in the amount of $2,336.48 and by cross-defendant Conn in the sum of $259.61, but without costs of suit or attorneys’ fees to Spang. Conn and Zebb are satisfied with the judgment but they resist Spang’s contention that it is entitled to attorneys’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.