McDonnell

McDonnell v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 804·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1718·45 Cal. App. 3d 653
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1975Civ. 34965California3,643 words

Opinion

Opinion

Good, J.

This is an appeal by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV post) from a judgment that mandated DMV to set aside its decision suspending respondent McDonnell’s driving license for six months pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 13353. The section creates an implied consent to a chemical test—blood, breath or urine—on the part of a driver suspected of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The driver may choose which he prefers. He must be informed that his failure to submit to such test or to complete it will result in a six-month suspension of his driving privilege. He must also be advised that he does not have the right to have an attorney present before stating whether he will submit to a test or deciding which to take or during administration of the test. In the event of refhsal, upon the officer’s sworn statement that there was reasonable cause to believe that such person had been driving under the influence and had refused or failed to complete the test, DMV is required to suspend the driver’s license, effective 10 days after written notice to the driver who may demand a hearing which must be held within 15 days after receipt of request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.