Haycock

People v. Haycock

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 179·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1667·45 Cal. App. 3d 90
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 1975Crim. 12351California1,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christian, J.

Donna Jean Haycock appeals from a probation order entered after a jury-found her guilty of possessing marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) and not guilty of possessing dangerous drugs (Health & Saf. Code, § 11910).

Appellant and several other persons were arrested on October 31, 1971, and an information was filed on May 31, 1972. Appellant pleaded not guilty on June 5, 1972, and trial commenced on April 16, 1973.

After the jury returned its verdict, appellant moved for new trial, complaining that the district attorney had failed to advise the defense or the court of appellant’s eligibility for diversion under Penal Code section 1000. The judge stated the view that the request for diversion was timely, but denied the motion for new trial “after reviewing the entire case.”

The sole issue on appeal is whether appellant was entitled to the diversion treatment provided for first-time drug offenders under Penal Code section 1000 et seq. Section 1000 states: “(a) This chapter shall apply whenever a case is before any court upon an accusatory pleading for violation of Section 11500, 11530, 11555, 11556, 11910, or 11990 of the Health and Safety Code and it appears, to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.