In Re Moore

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 356·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1685·45 Cal. App. 3d 285
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 1975Crim. 6438California2,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Petitioner had been sentenced to state prison on a manslaughter charge and thereafter released on parole. He was subsequently arrested on another charge. Morrissey hearings were had and his parole was revoked. Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus which petition was granted with the order that he be released. The Attorney General filed a notice of appeal and the trial court ordered the petitioner released on bail. This court stayed that order.

This case represents a classic overkill in the application of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 484 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ].

Morrissey

The format our judicial system uses in the creation of legal principles—the so-called reasoned - opinion—lends itself to nitpicking. An opinion, particularly one which represents a .departure from established principles, tends to become prolix as the court attempts to vindicate or rationalize its new position. Such an opinion becomes a treasure trove of polemic minutiae embellished with mountains of friendly but sometimes redundant authorities. By a careful and restrictive selection of choice phrases, the opinion can be used as authority for, and will give aid and comfort…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.