Russell

Russell v. Superior Court

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 3d 1114·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1697·91 Cal. Rptr. 255
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 1970Civ. 10635California1,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coughlin, J.

Petitioner Russell was charged in a two-count information with the offense of possession of a restricted dangerous drug in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11910, and possession of such a drug in the “San Diego Honor Camps” in violation of Penal Code section 4573.6; moved to dismiss the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995, upon the ground the evidence before the magistrate did not support a finding of probable cause to hold him to answer; and, upon denial of his motion, seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain further proceedings under the information upon the same ground.

Probable cause to hold an accused to answer to a criminal charge is shown where, from the evidence before the magistrate, “a man of ordinary caution or prudence would be led to believe and conscientiously entertain a strong suspicion” an offense has been committed and the accused is the offender. (Bompensiero v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 178, 183 [ 281 P.2d 250 ]; People v. Landry, 230 Cal.App.2d 775, 779 [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 202 ].)

For a period of approximately three weeks prior to March 24, 1970, petitioner had been an inmate of a county honor camp; on that date manifested symptoms…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.