Easton

Easton v. Superior Court

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 3d 243·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1624·90 Cal. Rptr. 642
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 1970Docket Nos. 10347, 10358California972 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

Harmon L. Easton petitions for a writ of mandate to vacate an order transferring venue of an action from San Diego to Los Angeles County, and to compel trial in San Diego County. Since there is no basis for venue in Los Angeles County, we grant the writ.

Harmon L. Easton and others sued Schneider Bros. Inc., a Chicago based commodity brokerage firm, and Gale Berry. Berry was Schneider Bros.’ Los Angeles office manager when the acts complained of occurred. When the motion for change of venue was made, however, Berry was no longer employed by Schneider Bros.; Schneider Bros, had closed its Los Angeles office and withdrawn from California.

Easton and the others, all former clients of Schneider Bros., alleged causes of action for breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty by “churning” their accounts, i.e., making numerous unauthorized sales and purchases, and failure to account. Compensatory and punitive damages are sought against Schneider Bros., its alleged alter egos Morris and Harold Schneider, and Gale Berry.

Gale Berry answered the complaint.

Without answering the complaint, Schneider Bros, moved for a change of venue on grounds of convenience of witnesses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.