Meskell

Meskell v. Culver City Unified School District

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 3d 815·1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 1669·96 Cal. Rptr. 773
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1970Civ. 35392California3,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

Frampton, J.

Statement of the Case

Plaintiff, as prime contractor on the project, brought an action to recover damages against defendant Culver City Unified School District (hereinafter District) and defendant Flewelling & Moody (hereinafter Flewelling), the architect retained by the District, caused principally by an alleged misrepresentation in the plans and specifications as to the weight of certain concrete roof segments which failed during the course of construction of a school auditorium for the District, and an alleged change in the specifications requiring a more expensive method of repairing voids in the concrete roof segments.

The cause was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants in the sum of $47,545.75 and against defendant District in the further sum of $3,718. A motion for a new trial was made on behalf of, and was granted as to each defendant. Thereafter plaintiff moved to strike the order granting the new trials, and this motion was granted upon the ground that the court had lost jurisdiction to grant the new trials. The appeals are from the order granting the motion to strike the order granting the new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.