People v. National Association of Realtors

Good Law
120 Cal. App. 3d 459·174 Cal. Rptr. 728·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1839·22 A.L.R. 4th 79
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 1981Civ. 18380California8,807 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Reviewing a civil antitrust action against professional real estate organizations, we hold certain group conduct constituted both an unlawful restraint of trade permitting injunctive relief, and unlawful business activity allowing imposition of civil penalties. The additional issue of whether the associational policy of refusing to sell investment multiple listing service information to otherwise qualified persons unless they also purchase general memberships in the associations is an illegal tying arrangement was not decided below and should be remanded for further findings.

Background

For 20 years San Diego Board of Realtors (SDBR) with the approval of the California Association of Realtors (CAR) and the National Association of Realtors (NAR) (collectively: the associations) openly encouraged its members to maintain uniform commission rates on residential sales (generally 6 percent) and a standard percentage at which to split sales commissions between listing and selling brokers (generally 50/50) within the greater San Diego market. The rates were originally set by an express agreement among members of the SDBR, the La Mesa Board of Realtors and the El Cajon Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.