Sussli

Sussli v. City of San Mateo

Good Law
120 Cal. App. 3d 1·173 Cal. Rptr. 781
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 198146085California4,628 words

Opinion

Opinion

Appellant Eugene Sussli was a candidate for the San Mateo City Council in an election held on March 8, 1977. Prior to the election, campaign signs supporting the candidacy of appellant and the reelection of another candidate, John Condon, were posted on public property within the city. On February 8, 1977, the city attorney sent a letter to all candidates, including Sussli, informing them that sign posting on public property was prohibited by local ordinance section 25.04.090, reproduced verbatim in the margin, [1] and requesting that all such campaign signs be removed no later than the following week under threat of summary removal by city officials. The letter also advised that under applicable ordinance provisions, sign posting on private property was permissible with the consent of the owner of the property. A copy of the ordinance regulating the time, manner and placement of an "election sign" was included with the written notification. [2]

When the candidates refused to comply with the written request, city personnel undertook removal of the offending signs, resulting in the institution of suit for injunctive and declaratory relief. At the conclusion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.