Nickelberry

United States Capital Corp. v. Nickelberry

Good Law
120 Cal. App. 3d 864·174 Cal. Rptr. 814·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1887
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1981Civ. 60370California1,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Albert Nickelberry from a judgment reviving a money judgment in favor of plaintiff United States Capital Corporation which it had obtained approximately 10 years earlier. Defendant’s sole defense was based on laches on the part of plaintiff in failing to satisfy or at least attempt to satisfy the original judgment within the 10-year period. The court rejected this argument and defendant appeals.

On June 10, 1969, plaintiff obtained a money judgment against defendant for $13,472.30. By means of an attachment $71.45 was collected on July 10, 1970. No other sums have been recovered. On June 20, 1979, a second writ of execution was obtained by plaintiff, however, according to plaintiff the execution was abandoned because the Sheriff of Alameda County was unable to execute within the 10-year period from the date of the original judgment.

Code of Civil Procedure sections 335 and 337.5, read together, permit an action enforcing a judgment to be commenced at any time within 10 years after the judgment has been entered. Once an action is begun within the statutory period, the creditor’s right to recover remains alive, even though the 10-year period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.