In Re Carson Bulletin

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 764·85 Cal. App. 3d 785
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 197853293California3,449 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richards, Watson, Dreyfuss & Gershon, Mitchell E. Abbott and Rochelle Browne for Contestant and Respondent.

OPINION

POTTER, J.

This is an appeal by O. Ray Watkins (hereinafter appellant), publisher of the Carson Bulletin, from a judgment of the superior court vacating a prior judgment adjudicating the Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation in and for the City of Carson.

In September 1976, appellant filed a verified petition pursuant to Government Code [1] section 6026, seeking a "judgment and Decree ascertaining and establishing the newspaper as a newspaper of general circulation as defined in said Section 6008, in and for the City of Carson...." In October, the petition was granted following an uncontested ex parte proceeding. The judgment recited that the court found: "[T]hat THE CARSON BULLETIN is a newspaper published for the dissemination of local and telegraphic news and intelligence of a general character, which has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers and has been `established' and `published,' as such terms are defined in said Section 6008 of the Government Code, at regular weekly intervals in the City of Carson ... for at least three years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.