In Re Marriage of Johnston

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 798·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2029·85 Cal. App. 3d 900·1 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1351
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 1978Civ. 52160California4,189 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alarcon, J.

The Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, the National Electrical Benefit Fund and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, (hereinafter claimants) have appealed from a judgment awarding to respondent and cross-appellant, Frances Elizabeth Johnston (hereinafter wife) one-half of the pension benefits to which respondent Clifford Albert Johnston (hereinafter husband) is entitled and requiring that claimants pay the proportionate share of wife directly to her. Claimants also appeal from that portion of the judgment denying to them an award of attorneys’ fees.

Cross-appellant, wife, appeals from that portion of the same judgment which authorizes claimants to deduct from each monthly pension benefit payment the sum of $5.

Husband and wife were married on December 10, 1936. On Januaiy 17, 1974, husband filed a petition for dissolution of that marriage. The amended response to the petition filed by wife listed as assets of the marriage, inter alia, pension funds payable monthly to husband, under the control of claimants.

On May 19, 1976, on motion of wife, claimants were joined as parties to the dissolution action. Claimants filed suit in the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.