Zee Toys, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 763·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2021·85 Cal. App. 3d 763
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1978Docket Nos. 52977, 53695, 53306California6,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

Potter, J.

These consolidated appeals are from summary judgments in two superior court actions which grant plaintiffs Zee Toys, Inc., and Formosa Plastics Group (U.S.A.), Inc. (Sup. Ct. No. C 179151) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sup.Ct. No. C 191156) refunds of ad valorem taxes paid under protest. In the Zee case, the taxes had been collected for the benefit of defendants County of Los Angeles and City of Long Beach; in the Sears case, the taxes had been collected for the benefit of defendants County of Los Angeles and City of Compton, the city in each case being the situs of the goods taxed.

In both cases, the tax involved was ad valorem taxation levied upon tangible personal property in the possession of plaintiffs stored in warehouses in Los Angeles County on the tax lien dates. Such property had been manufactured outside the United States and brought to this state by the plaintiffs as importers.

The plaintiffs in both actions claimed an exemption from taxation for a percentage of such imported goods in their possession based upon the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code sections 225 and 225.1. As then in effect, said sections read:

The facts bearing upon the exempt status…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.