Pacello

City and County of San Francisco v. Pacello

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 705·1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2010·85 Cal. App. 3d 637
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1978Civ. 41280California2,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sweeney, J.

Plaintiff, City and County of San Francisco, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action seeking to abate an alleged public nuisance.

Statement of Facts

The subject structure had originally been built in 1925, authorized by a permit to construct a residential, one-family, two-story building. From 1929 on the building had the separate unit in it and it had two addresses. A 1921 zoning ordinance authorized two-family dwellings in R-l districts as a permitted use (under certain conditions).

Defendants, the Pacellos, purchased the property, 152-154 Madrid Street on August 25, 1961. The property then consisted of a principal unit comprising the second-story level and an occupied housekeeping unit in the rear portion of the first or ground floor level, all a part of the original building.

On August 31, 1966, defendants applied for a building permit to “apply asbestos siding to rear” of their “existing two family dwelling.” The permit was approved on condition that defendants apply for a permit to demolish the ground floor unit. On September 14, 1966, defendants filed a building permit application to apply asbestos siding and to “legalize building as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.