Vick

Vick v. Board of Education of Los Angeles Unified School District

Good Law
132 Cal. Rptr. 506·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1845·61 Cal. App. 3d 657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 1976Civ. 46627California1,340 words

Opinion

Opinion

Allport, J.

Pursuant to a petition for writ of mandamus under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 filed in the superior court, Doris J. Vick seeks to compel the Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District and Los Angeles Unified School District to set aside its decision made May 21, 1973, not to reemploy her for the 1973-1974 school year.

It appears without conflict that on February 1, 1971, Vick was employed by the district as a probationary teacher. She served as such at the North Valley Occupational Center for the school years 1971-1972 and 1972-1973. On March 9, 1973, an accusation was filed preferring charges of unprofessional conduct, dishonesty and persistent violation of or refusal to obey reasonable regulations of state and district governing boards and advising that her services would not be required for the school year 1973-1974. Following an administrative hearing on the charges the hearing officer filed a proposed decision dated May 8, 1973, wherein some 11 of the charges were found to be established, each of which related to the welfare of the schools and the pupils. It was also found that: “None of the conduct charged occurred during the 1972-73…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.