Casteneda-Rivera

Casteneda-Rivera v. Holder

Good Law
423 F. App'x 729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 201107-73379California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The government’s petition for panel rehearing is granted.

The memorandum disposition filed on June 8, 2010, is withdrawn. A new memo randum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

Any petition for rehearing of the new memorandum disposition must be filed within 45 days.

MEMORANDUM

Jesus Casteneda-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to apply for adjustment of status. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Casteneda-Rivera’s motion as untimely where the motion was filed more than five months after the BIA’s final administrative order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2); see Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968 , 972 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that BIA denials of motions to reopen are reviewed for abuse of discretion), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir. 2005).

We lack jurisdiction to review Castene-da-Rivera’s equitable tolling contention because he failed to exhaust this claim before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.