Booth

County of San Mateo v. Booth

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 3d 388·185 Cal. Rptr. 349·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1915
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 1982Civ. 48241California4,691 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rattigan, J.

Plaintiff and respondent County of San Mateo (the County) commenced an action against defendant and appellant Robert Lee Booth (defendant) to establish that he was the father of a minor whom the County had supported in its aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) program, and to obtain reimbursement of the funds the County had paid out. After a nonjury trial, the court entered a judgment which declared that defendant was the father of the minor and ordered him to reimburse the County in the sum of $8,819.11. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The Pleadings and Procedural Sequence

The contentions on appeal require that the record be summarized in close detail. The County commenced the action by filing a “Complaint To Establish Parent-Child Relationship And Obtain Reimbursement Of Public Assistance” on February 5, 1979. The County stated a single cause of action in which it alleged in pertinent part as follows:

Defendant is the “natural father” of a named minor. The County had paid $8,819.11 “in public assistance” for the support of the child during the period from April 1, 1975, to October 31, 1978. “[A]t all times herein mentioned[,] defendant is and was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.