Mizirawi

Mizirawi v. Holl

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 3d 322·185 Cal. Rptr. 328·1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1908
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 1982Civ. 50476California884 words

Opinion

Opinion

Arne, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering contribution between defendant and appellant Richard E. Holl and codefendant and respondent Baldwin & Howell, a corporation, on a pro rata basis from a verdict awarding compensatory damages against both on a complaint charging them with negligent misrepresentation or fraud.

This is the third in a series of appeals in a matter that has been in litigation for over 11 years. Suffice it to say that following the second trial in this case a verdict was rendered against Angelo and Alfred Franchi, Baldwin & Howell and Richard E. Holl for $36,124 compensatory damages. While punitive damages were also awarded, they are not the subject of this appeal. The sum of $24,014.88 was paid to the plaintiff by Baldwin & Howell which then sought contribution from Richard E. Holl, its agent and employee, on a pro rata basis. The motion was granted and a judgment was entered in favor of respondent, Baldwin & Howell, against Richard E. Holl in the sum of $12,007.44.

In prosecuting this appeal appellant contends that the right of Baldwin & Howell to seek contribution from him is barred by the provisions of section 875, subdivision (d) of the Code of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.