Tate

Johnson v. Tate

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1176·215 Cal. App. 3d 1282·264 Cal. Rptr. 68
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1989B040623California1,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goertzen, J.

Jimmie Johnson appeals from an order dismissing his petition filed under Probate Code section 17200. The dismissal order was entered on January 6, 1989. We treat the order as a judgment that is appealable pursuant to Probate Code section 17207.

Factual Background

Vincent Miranda and George Tate (respondent herein) each created “Living Trusts” on January 28, 1983. Each trust was identical in its provi sions, except as to the names of the distributees in the event of death. The Miranda trust provides that upon his death, the property in his trust shall be distributed “to his good friend and business partner, . . . George Tate.” It further provides that if George Tate has not survived Trustor Miranda, the property in the trust shall distribute to “the Trustor’s business associate, Jimmie Johnson.”

The Tate trust provides that upon his death, the property in his trust shall be distributed “to his good friend and business partner, Vincent Miranda.” It also provides that if Miranda has not survived Trustor Tate, the property in the trust shall distribute to the “Trustor’s business associate, Jimmie Johnson.”

Each of the trusts provided that the trustor, during his lifetime,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.