Malone

Malone v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1105·215 Cal. App. 3d 275·263 Cal. Rptr. 499
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 3, 1989G007306California1,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

We hold here that underinsured motorist coverage is not the equivalent of full excess coverage. As the statutory scheme is designed, the underinsured motorist carrier gets a dollar-for-dollar credit for all payments by third party tortfeasors to the insureds, whether the insureds are made whole or not. In other words, a carrier providing underinsured motorist benefits never pays the full amount, only the difference between the policy limits and all contributions by all tortfeasors to all insureds.

I

Jo Ann Malone’s husband was struck by a car and killed as he changed a tire on a roadway. Plaintiff was in their truck at the time and witnessed his death. The driver was insured by a Teachers Insurance Company policy with limits of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. Nationwide provided single limit underinsured motorist coverage for the Malone vehicle in the amount of $500,000. Malone’s children assigned their rights as their father’s heirs to her, and she recovered $100,000 from Teachers in wrongful death damages. Her husband’s workers’ compensation carrier paid an additional $17,528.87. Nationwide paid its $500,000 policy limits less the sums received by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.