Estate of Cruz

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1247·215 Cal. App. 3d 1416·264 Cal. Rptr. 492
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1989C006111California1,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

The superior court found appellant Lani Castro Cruz (Cruz) was the sole known heir for and entitled to possession of the whole of an estate which had escheated to the state. In this appeal Cruz challenges the portion of the court’s order prohibiting immediate distribution of the estate. She asserts she is entitled to immediate distribution and the state agrees. We also find delaying the distribution was improper.

A public administrator of the estate at issue had asked that the court distribute it to the state when no heirs claimed it. (Prob. Code, §§ 1144, 1027.) Cruz filed a petition with the court seeking distribution of the estate to herself on the basis the decedent was her uncle and that she was the sole known heir. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1355.) The superior court found Cruz was the sole known heir and that she was entitled to the whole estate but ordered that it not be distributed to her until five years had elapsed from the date upon which the estate had first escheated to the state.

In delaying distribution to Cruz, the court apparently relied on Code of Civil Procedure section 1355 and former Probate Code section 1027. Probate Code section 1027 formerly required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.