Alexander

Alexander v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 3d 97·163 Cal. Rptr. 411·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1656·14 A.L.R. 4th 1229
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 1980Civ. 55870California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashby, J.

Appellant California Unemployment Insurance Appeals

Board appeals from a judgment granting a writ of mandate compelling the board to pay unemployment insurance benefits to respondent Marilyn Alexander. The board challenges the trial court’s finding that respondent was available for work within the meaning of Unemployment Insurance Code section 1253, subdivision (c). We conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding. (Glick v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 493, 503 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 591 P.2d 24 ].)

Respondent was employed as an X-ray technologist at St. Joseph’s Medical Center. She terminated employment because she was and is allergic to cigarette smoke. Her employer, although having instituted a no-smoking policy in respondent’s work area, did not enforce that policy. According to respondent’s physician, respondent can engage in full-time work in her occupation if the conditions are smoke free.

Respondent had sought work in office facilities, hospitals and clinics and had found similar conditions of cigarette smoking as existed at St. Joseph’s Medical Center. Respondent testified, “I have heard of a few general practitioners’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.