Cal-Am Corp. v. Department of Real Estate

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 3d 453·163 Cal. Rptr. 729·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1693·6 A.L.R. 4th 1281
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 1980Civ. 56545California2,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus. It concerns the jurisdictional authority of the Department of Real Estate (hereinafter Department) to regulate, in the State of California, the sale of time-share interests in resort condominiums. In order to be subject to Department regulations requiring permits and public reports, the sale by appellant of membership interests in the Royal Hawaiian Adventure Club must constitute the sale or lease of lots or parcels in a subdivision. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 10249.1, 11000, 11004.5.) We affirm the finding of the superior court that the Department acted within its authority in issuing an order requiring appellant to desist and refrain from selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, membership interests in the Royal Hawaiian Adventure Club, until such time as it has obtained from the Commissioner of Real Estate a permit and public report. The desist and refrain order was properly issued pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 11019.

The order was issued following an investigation of a complaint against the Royal Hawaiian Adventure Club (hereinafter RHAC) and became effective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.