Sampson

County of Alameda v. Sampson

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 3d 584·163 Cal. Rptr. 915·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1708
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 1980Civ. 46929California1,852 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

The County of Alameda (hereafter respondent) filed and served an action naming as defendant Cecil Francis Sampson (hereafter appellant) for reimbursement of public assistance and child support. Respondent’s complaint alleged that appellant is the father of Tamantha M. Sampson, born March 27, 1966, and Sean L. Sampson, born April 29, 1968 (hereafter the minor children), and that Lorraine Carol Sampson is their mother. After appellant filed his answer denying that he is the father of the children respondent filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of paternity. The motion was granted by default. However, by stipulation of the parties, the court set aside and vacated the default judgment. Thereafter, all parties appearing, the court reheard and granted the motion. The court’s order granting partial summary judgment indicates that the court received in evidence two documents. Respondent “submitted” a “true” copy of appellant’s interlocutory judgment dissolving his marriage to Lorraine Carol Sampson. Appellant “submitted” a sworn statement that appellant is not the father of Tamantha M. and Sean L. Sampson. However, documentary evidence of appellant’s sterility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.