In Re Messerschmidt

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 3d 514·163 Cal. Rptr. 580·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1700
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 1980Crim. 12147California794 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was ordered released by mistake. Just how this occurred is academic. While he knew a mistake had been made, he did not cause it and was without fault. He remained at large 203 days before being returned to prison. He now wants credit for that 203 days against his remaining sentence. The Department of Corrections has declined to give him that credit. Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the superior court which, after a hearing, denied the petition. After petitioning this court unsuccessfully, he filed a similar petition in the Supreme Court which ordered that an alternative writ be issued by this court. We have done so and now deny the petition.

Under Penal Code section 2900, a prison term begins upon delivery of the prisoner to the prison. That section further provides that if thereafter he is temporarily released, such time is not to be computed as part of his term. Now petitioner urges this court to establish a rule that when a prisoner is mistakenly released from confinement, he is entitled to credit against his prison term for the period during which he remained free. We decline to establish any such rule.

Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.