Bernardo Villas Management Corp. v. Black

Good Law
190 Cal. App. 3d 153·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1483·235 Cal. Rptr. 509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1987D004256California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiener, J.

Plaintiff Bernardo Villas Management Corporation Number Two (Bernardo Villas Management) appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants Mary Black and Kenneth Trout. We affirm.

Mary Black and Kenneth Trout lived in a condominium managed by Bernardo Villas Management. The condominium was subject to a declaration of covenants and restrictions which included: “No truck, camper, trailer, boat of any kind or other form of recreational vehicle shall be parked on the [Bernardo] Villas 6 project, except temporarily and solely for the purposes of loading and unloading, without the prior approval of the Architectural Committee____The carports shall be used for parking of passenger automobiles or non-powered vehicles such as bicycles, only----”

In February 1985 Trout bought a new pickup which he parked in the carport for Black’s condominium. Bernardo Villas Management sued to enjoin him and Black from parking the pickup in the carport and to recover $2,060 in fines it had imposed for violating the condominium restriction.

A condominium project may impose covenants and restrictions on the use or enjoyment of any portion of the common interest area. (Civ. Code, § 1353.) These…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.