Lundell

Lundell v. Sidney MacHine Tool Co.

Good Law
190 Cal. App. 3d 1546·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1561·236 Cal. Rptr. 70
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1987B0019269California3,988 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanson, J.

Introduction

This product liability case arises out of an accident occurring on November 18, 1981, when plaintiff Dan Lundell (plaintiff and/or Lundell), while in the course of his employment, received injuries to his hand while operating a lathe.

Procedural History

On November 3, 1982, Lundell filed a complaint containing three causes of action (strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty) seeking damages for his injuries. The complaint names as defendant Sidney Machine Tool Company, a corporation.

On February 18, 1983, the amended answer to the complaint was filed by “John H. Sherbondy and Mary M. Sherbondy dba Sidney Machine Tool Company (erroneously sued and served on Sidney Machine Tool Company)” —(hereinafter defendants and/or the Sherbondys).

On August 15, 1985, following discovery, the Sherbondys filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c along with a memorandum of points and authorities accompanied by a declaration of John H. Sherbondy and accompanied by a separate statement of undisputed material facts as required by section 437c, subdivision (b). Defendants’ motion argued that they are not liable as successor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.