SureSafe Industries, Inc. v. C & R PIER MFG.

Good Law
850 F. Supp. 869·1993 WL 645270·27 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1557·1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19588
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 1993Civ. 92-1050-E(LSP)California2,252 words

Opinion

Opinion

Enright, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

This is an action for infringement for U.S. Patent No. 4,937,989 (the ’989 patent) claiming a mobile home support that elevates and ties together “trailer-like” sections of mobile homes. The suit is brought by plaintiffs Sure Safe Industries, Inc. (“Sure Safe”) and Intertrack Management, Inc. (“Intertrack”) against defendants C & R Pier Mfg. (“C & R”), its president, Richard Clifton, and a former shareholder of C & R Pier, Chuck Giles.

The ’989 patent claims a combination of three assemblies: 1) a pair of piers; 2) a two-part clamp to engage an I-beam (the “marriage lock”, and 3) a tie-rod assembly for connecting piers. The ’989 patent does not contain claims for any single subassembly by itself. Only a product comprised of ah three subassemblies arranged as set out in the claims infringes.

Defendants have brought three motions for summary judgment: 1) based on noninfringement; 2) based on invalidity; and 3) by Chuck Giles.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment against a party which “fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.