Jenkins

Jenkins v. Tuneup Masters

Bad Law
190 Cal. App. 3d 1·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1475·235 Cal. Rptr. 214
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1987C000057California5,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

William Jenkins and Nathalie Munk (landlords) appeal from an unfavorable judgment in an unlawful detainer action. The trial court gave judgment for the tenant, Tuneup Masters, on the ground that it had exercised an option to extend the lease. The notice of extension was lost in the mail. The landlords contend that the court erred because the notice was not mailed in the manner required by the lease and because there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that the notice was mailed at all. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.

In the published portion of this opinion we hold, among other things, that the risk of loss of a notice of extension of a lease, required under its provisions to be “sent by [] certified United States Mail, return receipt requested,” is upon the addressee once the notice reaches the custody of the United States Postal Service, notwithstanding that the notice is not deposited in an officially designated receptacle.

Facts

Tuneup Masters commenced its tenancy at 2820 P Street, Sacramento, under a written lease on January 15, 1979. The leasehold term expired five years from the first day of the calendar month following the date of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.