Long

Long v. Pinto

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 3d 946·179 Cal. Rptr. 182·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2485
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1981Civ. 22961California1,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Levitt, J.

David M. Long, plaintiff, appeals a superior court order of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Jerry M. Pinto, in a suit for libel, interference with contract and interference with prospective economic gain.

In. early 1976, Dr. Long applied for staff privileges at Mercy Hospital. In July the hospital’s surgical supervising committee denied the application. Long appealed the decision. The appeal prompted the supervising committee to form a judicial review committee (Committee) to look into Long’s professional qualifications. The inquiry included a review of files on Long held at other hospitals where he already had staff privileges. Long consented to the review process.

Pinto, a surgeon, was appointed by the Committee to review Long’s files at Alvarado Hospital. Concerned over information uncovered by his review, Pinto sent a letter on May 20, 1977, to the Board of Medical Quality Assurance (BMQA) a state agency responsible for reviewing the performance of doctors licensed to practice in California. In the letter, Pinto called attention to what he felt was a large number of unnecessary operations performed on elderly rest home patients. He claimed such surgical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.