Garnica

People v. Garnica

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 3d 727·175 Cal. Rptr. 521·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1975
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 1981Crim. 4419California4,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

Appellant stands convicted after a jury trial of first degree murder; he was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal he contends the following errors compel reversal of his conviction: (1) the trial court should have suppressed the prosecution testimony of Marla Klemmer under People v. Hitch (1974) 12 Cal.3d 641 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 9 , 527 P.2d 361 ] because the police failed to preserve a tape recording of the first interview with Ms. Klemmer; (2) the court erred by admitting evidence of an uncharged offense—attempted murder—under the rationale that the evidence was admissible to show a common plan or design; and (3) the prosecutor committed Griffin error during argument to the jury.

As we shall explain, none of these contentions have merit. Appellant, however, is entitled to good-time/work-time credits for presentence custody.

The Evidence

In 1977 appellant was a lieutenant in the Nuestra Familia, a prison gang which was originally organized to provide security to Mexican-American prisoners but which expanded into various forms of criminal activity outside prison.

Appellant’s affiliation with Nuestra Familia and high rank in that organization were confirmed by Art…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.