United States v. Feliciano Rojas-Vivar

Good Law
424 F. App'x 665
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 201109-10439California841 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Feliciano Gilberto Rojas-Vivar pled guilty to three counts of harboring illegal aliens for profit in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii) and (a)(l)(B)(i). Pursuant to the appeal waiver in the plea agreement, we dismiss his appeal.

Rojas-Vivar recognizes that his “waiver[ ] of appeal must stand or fall with the agreement of which [it is] a part. If the agreement is voluntary, and taken in compliance with Rule 11, then the waiver of appeal must be honored.” United States v. Portillo-Cano, 192 F.3d 1246, 1250 (9th Cir.1999) (quotation omitted). To determine whether Rojas-Vivar’s guilty plea and, by extension, his plea agreement were knowing and voluntary, we look to the Rule 11 plea colloquy. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149 , 1157 n. 5 (9th Cir.2005) overruled on other grounds by United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). Because Rojas-Vivar did not object to the plea colloquy before the District Court, we re view only for plain error. United States v. Ross, 511 F.3d 1233, 1235 (9th Cir.2008). Under that standard, Rojas-Vivar “must show a reasonable probability that, but for the error,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.