In Re Maria

Good Law
167 Cal. App. 3d 1099·213 Cal. Rptr. 733
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 198531331California1,746 words

Opinion

Opinion

Alden J. Fulkerson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant.

Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr., County Counsel, Howard P. Brody, Chief Deputy County Counsel, and Barbara Baird, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

WIENER, J.

Elizabeth V. appeals the judgment freeing her three-year-old daughter Maria (Maria) from her custody and control. (Civ. Code, § 232.) [1] The court found Elizabeth had abandoned Maria and failed to provide an adequate parental relationship. The court rejected Elizabeth's alternative plan to place Maria with her maternal grandmother.

The primary focus of this appeal is directed to the court's decision to limit Elizabeth's lawyer's inspection of documents from two files maintained by the county to those documents which the court determined were relevant to the action. Elizabeth says it is only her lawyer who can determine whether the documents are relevant. She asserts the court's in camera inspection of the files to determine which portions were relevant and, therefore, discoverable by her counsel was prejudicial error. Although we are sensitive to the fundamental interests involved in this type of proceeding, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.