Prince

People v. Prince

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 748·203 Cal. App. 3d 848·250 Cal. Rptr. 154
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 1988H002102California4,052 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chapman, J.

By amended information, defendant Eva Karen Prince was charged with (1) murder (Pen. Code, § 187),* (2) murder in the commission of a felony (§ 187), (3) attempted murder (§§ 664/187), (4) arson of an inhabited structure (§451, subd. (b)), (5) arson causing great bodily injury (§451, subd. (a)), (6) assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)), and (7) burglary (§ 459). As to the charges of attempted murder, arson, assault, and burglary, it was also alleged that Prince intentionally and personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7).

Prince entered a plea of not guilty to each of the charges, and denied each of the great bodily injury allegations. Thereafter, the criminal charges were adjourned pending a determination of her then mental condition pursuant to section 1368. A jury found Prince was competent to stand trial. Thereafter, Prince entered an additional plea of not guilty by reason of insanity (§ 1026).

A jury having been waived on the plea of not guilty, the trial court found Prince guilty of (1) murder in the commission of a felony, (2) arson of an inhabited structure, (3) arson causing great bodily injury, and (4)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.