Czahara

People v. Czahara

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 790·203 Cal. App. 3d 1468·250 Cal. Rptr. 836
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 1988A039677California3,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Low, J.

We hold here that a jury should not be instructed on transferred intent to kill when a defendant is charged with multiple attempted murders arising from a single act.

Michael Andrew Czahara appeals his convictions for the attempted murders of Carole Christie and Ronald Johnson. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 664.) We hold that the jury instruction on transferred intent was erroneous and prejudicial in the circumstances of this case and reverse the conviction for attempted murder of Johnson, but affirm the conviction for attempted murder of Christie.

Carole Christie met Czahara in March 1986, and they began dating in April or May. As the relationship developed, they discussed marriage and agreed to be sexually faithful to each other. Christie, however, began to doubt Czahara’s fidelity when she noticed a piece of unfamiliar lingerie hanging on his bathroom door. In late July, Christie began dating Ron Johnson. On September 14, 1986, Christie told Czahara that she did not want to see him any more. Czahara threatened to kill Christie and himself. Christie reported the threat to police and obtained a restraining order against Czahara.

On September 19, Christie was at Johnson’s house…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.