Frankel

National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Frankel

Caution
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 730·203 Cal. App. 3d 830·250 Cal. Rptr. 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 1988B029970California2,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fukuto, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment rejecting an insurer’s assertion of noncoverage under the uninsured motorist portion of an automobile insurance policy.

The insurer sued its insured for a judicial declaration of noncoverage. The insured cross-complained against the insurer for bad faith, pleading the usual tort, contract, and statutory theories of recovery. This cross-complaint was severed, and its resolution deferred, while the insurer’s declaratory judgment claim was tried. Consequently the declaratory judgment from which the insurer appeals is a nonfinal judgment, and hence nonappealable. (E.g., Crocker-Anglo Nat. Bank v. Kuchman (1961) 194 Cal.App.2d 589 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 230 ].) The severance of the complaint from the cross-complaint does not make the judgment on the complaint separately appealable, unlike the situation in Schonfeld v. City of Vallejo (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 401 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 669 ], because the complaint raises issues closely related to those posed by the yet-untried cross-complaint. Hence we lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

We will, however, treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate (see, e.g., Olson v. Cory (1983) 35…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.