League of Women Voters v. Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination Committee

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 722·203 Cal. App. 3d 529·250 Cal. Rptr. 161
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 3, 1988B029791California12,982 words

Opinion

Opinion

Spencer, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs League of Women Voters of California, Gerald Uelman and Richard Floyd appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants.

Procedural Background

The parties submitted their respective motions for summary adjudication primarily on stipulated facts and exhibits, although defendants submitted some additional evidence in the form of declarations. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion in its entirety and granted defendants’ motion as it related to six issues alleged to pose no triable issues of material fact; the trial court determined there were no triable questions of material fact, adjudged these issues to be without substantial controversy and deemed them established. As to two other issues, the trial court denied defendants’ motion.

Thereafter, the parties stipulated the court’s ruling of December 1, 1986, and its order of December 11, 1986, specifying certain issues without substantial controversy should be entered as a final judgment in the matter. They further stipulated there was no triable issue of material fact as to the specific provisions contained in a proposed judgment and, as to those issues the court had designated as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.