Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. v. American Vanguard Corp.

Good Law
1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 677·203 Cal. App. 3d 285·249 Cal. Rptr. 787
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 1988F008109California6,604 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pettitt, J.

Code of Civil Procedure* section 1021.6 permits a court, upon motion and after reviewing the evidence in the principal case, to award attorney’s fees to a person who prevails on a claim for implied indemnity. Before the court can make such an award, however, it must find that: (1) the indemnitee, in protection of its own interest, was required to bring or defend an action against a third party due to a tort of the indemnitor; (2) the indemnitor was properly notified of the demand to bring the action or to provide the defense and did not avail itself of the opportunity to act; and (3) the trier of fact determined the indemnitee was without fault in the principal case that serves as the basis for the indemnity action or that the indemnitee had a final judgment entered in his or her favor granting a summary judgment, a nonsuit, or a directed verdict.

In the present case, the appellants, Helena Chemical Company (Helena) and Leffingwell Chemical Company, a division of Uniroyal Incorporated (Leffingwell), along with the respondent, American Vanguard Corporation (Amvac), were codefendants in a lawsuit in which it was ultimately determined, inter alia, that respondent Amvac was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.