Baker

Baker v. Hubbard

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 3d 226·161 Cal. Rptr. 551·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1390
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1980Civ. 18469California3,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Nathan M. Hubbard, a general building contractor (Contractor), appeals a judgment on his cross-complaint denying him the right to foreclose on a mechanic’s lien, against Adams, a landowner (Owner) upon whose improved real property Contractor made certain modifications pursuant to a contract with a lessee in possession. We affirm the judgment.

Factually, Owner purchased a 50-year-old building and its site which was then licensed as a convalescent hospital. After one month of unsuccessful self-operation as an intermediate-care facility, Owner entered into a five-year lease with Hartley (Lessee) who assumed control July 1, 1972, and continued to operate the facility as an intermediate-care center although the lease was not specifically restricted to this use. Owner, and later Lessee, relied primarily on Medi-Cal patients as the major source of clientele and revenue.

The lease was prepared by Owner in a cut-and-paste method from various samples he obtained. It reads in part as follows: “5 [the second one]. Use of the Premises’. The premises are let to Tenant for use as a nursing retirement-convalescent home/hospital with related operations. Tenant shall not use or permit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.