Toso

Toso v. City of Santa Barbara

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 3d 934·162 Cal. Rptr. 210·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1451
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 1980Docket Nos. 49261, 49990California7,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kingsley, J.

This is an action filed by Toso individually and as agent of others against the City of Santa Barbara and all members of the city council who held office during the year 1974. The first cause of action seeks inverse condemnation damages under section 1246.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (now § 1036); the second cause of action seeks damages for inverse condemnation; the third cause of action seeks a writ of mandate to compel the city to grant to Toso a rezoning of the property involved; the fourth claim is in mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085); and the fifth cause of action seeks declaratory relief. After a trial judgment was entered for the defendants on the first two causes of action and in favor of plaintiffs on the third, fourth, and fifth causes of action. The effect of the judgment in favor of plaintiffs was to vacate the proceedings hereinafter discussed that denied Toso a requested rezoning and to order the city to grant the rezoning requested.

The city has appealed from the judgment against it on the third, fourth, and fifth causes of action; Toso has appealed from the judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the city on the first and second causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.