Yarnell & Associates v. Superior Court

Bad Law
106 Cal. App. 3d 918·165 Cal. Rptr. 421·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1925
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 1980Civ. 49619California1,516 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

This petition challenges the denial of a motion to quash service upon petitioner and the granting of $250 in sanctions against pe titioner for filing a frivolous motion. We have concluded that the motion to quash service was properly denied, but that the trial court was without authority to award sanctions against petitioner. We therefore grant a peremptory writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its award of sanctions.

The challenged orders were made in connection with a lawsuit involving construction of the “Albany Hills” residential community complex. The action began when Western Waterproofing Company, Inc., a subcontractor, filed a mechanics lien action against the owner-developer, Interstate Albany Corporation. Shortly before the trial date the owner-developer sought a continuance of the trial date in order to cross-complain against the general contractor Williams & Burrows, Inc. Plaintiff became concerned about the delay which might occur if the general contractor sought to cross-complain against others for indemnity, and as a result, the court ordered that the general contractor serve any cross-complaints no later than November 22, 1979.

The general…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.