Garton

Garton v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 3d 365·165 Cal. Rptr. 449·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 1882
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 1980Civ. 18379California4,644 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reynoso, J.

We consider whether a cause of action was stated on the basis of (1) a false acknowledgment on a deed of trust, and (2) for breach of contract and negligent performance of duties as title searcher and escrow holder in a transaction dealing with real property. Plaintiffs Charles P. and Burleen Garton appeal from a judgment of dismissal with prejudice in favor of defendants Title Insurance and Trust Company (TI&T) and Stephen Craig Hunter. The Superior Court of Sacramento County sustained a demurrer to their second amended complaint without leave to amend. We reverse and remand.

A summary of the complaint’s allegations follow. The appeal, of course, deals only with the causes of action against TI&T and Hunter. Defendant Pioneer Realty is the corporate employer of defendants Miller, Silva and Munoz. Silva and Munoz are licensed real estate salespersons, and Miller is a licensed real estate broker. TI&T is the corporate employer of Hunter and Reed. Hunter is a commissioned notary public, and Reed is an escrow officer.

The factual background is this: In 1977 Charles Jeffries was the owner of real property located in Sacramento County. Jeffries entered into two written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.