Gerritsen

Gerritsen v. Escobar Y Cordova

Good Law
688 F. Supp. 556·1988 WL 69632·1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9385
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 23, 1988CV85-5020-PAR (KX)California1,938 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff in his latest (December 23, 1987) complaint charges various individual and government defendants with violation of numerous constitutional, federal statutory, and state common law rights. These claims arise primarily out of plaintiffs protests over a period of years in El Pueblo De Los Angeles State Historic Park against certain Mexican government policies and the alleged response of the defendants to those protests. An earlier complaint against the United Mexican States and its officials was dismissed by this court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 ; a claim against president Hurtado was dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff appealed the jurisdictional ruling. In Gerritsen v. Hurtado, 819 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1987) the Ninth Circuit upheld the court’s ruling on § 1343, but — believing that plaintiff was denied leave to amend— suggested other possible sources of jurisdiction and remanded the case to this court.

Plaintiff filed his latest complaint on December 23, 1987. He also filed a Preliminary Statement of Pre-Trial Contentions of Fact that identifies which claims are alleged against each defendant and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.